Come join me on PickensPlan

Join me on PickensPlan Raymond Jewell has: 1 friend If you want to get off foreign oil and balance our Countries budget then join the Pickens Cause. Taking back out revenue from spending on foreign oil will make out country great. Click to Join Members on PickensPlan: Dave Brundage Jeffrey Boeyink Lexi Fish Christine Stineman Micah Lauer About PickensPlan 172483 members 9285 photos 809 videos 8571 discussions 191 events 2573 blog posts   To control which emails you receive on PickensPlan, click here

Obama: Avoids the Truth...

Why Won't Obama Talk About Columbia?
The years he won't discuss may explain the Ayers tie he keeps lying about.

By Andrew C. McCarthy

-- 

Barack Obama does not want to talk about Columbia. Not even to his good friends at the New York Times, who've so reliably helped him bleach away his past — a past neck-deep in the hard Left radicalism he has gussied up but never abandoned. Why? I suspect it is because Columbia would shred his thin post-partisan camouflage.

You might think the Times would be more curious. After all, the Democrats' presidential nominee has already lied to the Gray Lady about the origins of his relationship with Weather Underground terrorists Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn. Back in May, in a cheery profile of Obama's early Chicago days, the Times claimed (emphasis is mine): Mr. Obama also fit in at Hyde Park's fringes, among university faculty members like Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn, unrepentant members of the radical Weather Underground that bombed the United States Capitol and the Pentagon to protest the Vietnam War. Mr. Obama was introduced to the couple in 1995 at a meet-and-greet they held for him at their home, aides said. Now look, anyone who gave five seconds of thought to that passage smelled a rat. Ayers and Dohrn are passionate radical activists who lived as fugitives for a decade. There's no way they held a political coming-out party for someone who was unknown to them. Obviously, they already knew him well enough by then to feel very comfortable. They might have been sympathetic to a relative stranger, but sponsoring such a gathering in one's living room is a strong endorsement.  And now, even the Times now knows it's been had. In this past weekend's transparentwhitewashing of the Obama/Ayers tie, the paper claimed that the pair first met earlier in 1995, "at a lunchtime meeting about school reform in a Chicago skyscraper[.]" That storyline is preposterous too, but it is also a marked revision of the paper's prior account (which, naturally, reporter Scott Shane fails to mention). Why the change? The tacit concession was forced by Stanley Kurtz and Steve Diamond — whom the Times chooses not to acknowledge but who hover over Shane's sunny narrative like a dark cloud.  Despite all manner of stonewalling by Obama, Ayers and their allies, these commentators have doggedly pursued information about the Chicago Annenberg Challenge. That's the $150+ million "education reform" piggy bank substantially controlled in the nineties by Ayers and Obama, who doled out tens of millions of dollars to Leftist radicals — radicals who, like their patrons, understood that control over our institutions, and especially our schools, was a surer and less risky way to spread their revolution than blowing up buildings and mass-murdering American soldiers. As Diamond observes, in a 2006 speech in Venezuela, with Leftist strongman Hugo Chavez looking on, Ayers exhorted: "Teaching invites transformations, it urges revolutions small and large. La educacion es revolucion!" Be clear on that much: Whether clothed as a terrorist or an academic, Ayers has made abundantly clear in his public statements, both before and after he established a working relationship and mutual admiration society with Obama, that he remains a revolutionary fueled by hatred of the United States. And while Obama now ludicrously pleads ignorance about Ayers's terrorism — the terrorism that made the unabashed Ayers an icon of the Left — understand that this rabid anti-Americanism is the common denominator running through Obama's orbit of influences.  Yes, Ayers is blunter than Obama. As he so delicately told the Times, America makes him "want to puke." The smoother Obama is content to say our society needs fundamental "change." But what they're talking about is not materially different. Such sentiments should make Obama unelectable. So, when it comes to his own radical moorings, Obama is engaged in classic liar behavior. He changes his story as the facts change — and the burden is always on you to dig up the facts, not on him to come clean. Yesterday, asked to comment on the Ayers relationship, David Axelrod, Obama's top political adviser, hilariouslychirped, "There's no evidence that they're close." Translation: Get back to us when you can prove more damaging information — until then, we don't need to further refine our perjury. And then Axelrod gave us still more lies: "There's no evidence that Obama in any way subscribed to any of Ayers' views."  Oh yeah? Well, Mr. Axelrod, how do you explain Obama's breathless endorsement of Ayers's 1997 Leftist polemic on the criminal-justice system, A Kind and Just Parent? As Stanley Kurtz has recounted, Ayers's book is a radical indictment of American society: We, not the criminals, are responsible for the violent crime that plagues our cities; even the most vicious juvenile offenders should not be tried as adults; prisons should eventually be replaced by home detention; American justice is comparable to South Africa under Apartheid. Obama's reaction? He described the book as "a searing and timely account" — a take even the Times concedes was a "rave review."  Obama and Ayers shared all kinds of views. That is why they worked so well together at the Chicago Annenberg Challenge (CAC), funding the likes of Mike Klonsky, a fellow SDS and Maoist associate of Ayers who, as Steve Diamond relates, used to host a "social justice" blog on Obama's campaign website. With Obama heading the board of directors that approved expenditures and Ayers, the mastermind running its operational arm, hundreds of thousands of CAC dollars poured into the "Small Schools Workshop" — a project begun by Ayers and run by Klonsky to spur the revolution from the ground up. Precisely because they shared the same views, Obama and Ayers also worked comfortably together on the board of the Woods Fund. There, they doled out thousands of dollars to Jeremiah Wright's Trinity Church to promote its Marxist "black liberation theology." Moreover, they underwrote the Arab American Action Network (AAAN) founded by Rashid Khalidi, a top apologist for Yasser Arafat. As National Review's David Pryce-Jones notes, Khalidi once directed WAFA, the terrorist PLO's news agency. Then, like Ayers, he repackaged himself as an academic who rails at American policy. The AAAN, which supports driver's licenses and public welfare benefits for illegal aliens, holds that the establishment of Israel was an illegitimate "catastrophe."  Khalidi, who regards Israel as a "racist" "apartheid" state, supports Palestinian terror strikes against Israeli military targets. It's little surprise that he should be such a favorite of Ayers, the terrorist for whom "racism" and "apartheid" trip off the tongue as easily as "pass the salt."  And it's no surprise that the like-minded Obama would be a fan. Khalidi, after all, has mastered the Arafat art of posing as a moderate before credulous Westerners while (as Martin Kramerdocuments) scalding America's "Zionist lobby" when addressing Arabic audiences. The Obama who decries "bitter" Americans "cling[ing] to guns or religion" when he's in San Francisco but morphs into a God-fearing Second Amendment enthusiast when he's in Pennsylvania — like the Obama who pummels NAFTA before labor union supporters but has advisers quietly assure the Canadians not to worry about such campaign cant — surely appreciates the craft. Obama and Ayers not only demonstrated their shared view of Khalidi by funding him. They also gave glowing testimonials at a farewell dinner when Khalidi left the University of Chicago for Columbia's greener pastures. That would be the same Columbia from which Obama graduated in 1983.  Khalidi was leaving to become director of Columbia's Middle East Institute, assuming a professorship endowed in honor of another Arafat devotee, the late Edward Said. A hero of the Left who consulted with terrorist leaders (including Hezbollah's Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah) and was once photographed hurling rocks at Israelis from the Lebanese border, Said was exposed by researcher Justus Reid Weiner as a fraud who had created a fictional account of his childhood, the rock on which he built his Palestinian grievance mythology.  We know precious little about Obama's Columbia years, but the Los Angeles Times has reportedthat he studied under Said. In and of itself, that is meaningless: Said was a hotshot prof and hundreds of students took his comparative-lit courses. But Obama plainly maintained some sort of tie with Said — a photo making the Internet rounds shows Obama conversing with the great man himself at a 1998 Arab American community dinner in Chicago, where the Obamas and Saids were seated together. Said had a wide circle of radical acquaintances. That circle clearly included Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn. When they came out of hiding in the early 1980s (while Obama was attending Columbia), Ayers took education courses at Bank Street College, adjacent to Columbia in Morningside Heights — before earning his doctorate at Columbia's Teachers College in 1987. Said was so enamored of Ayers that he commended the unrepentant terrorist's 2001 memoir,Fugitive Days — the book in which the haughty Ayers brags about his Weatherman past — with this glowing dust-jacket blurb: What makes Fugitive Days unique is its unsparing detail and its marvelous human coherence and integrity. Bill Ayers's America and his family background, his education, his political awakening, his anger and involvement, his anguished re-emergence from the shadows: all these are rendered in their truth without a trace of nostalgia or "second thinking." For anyone who cares about the sorry mess we are in, this book is essential, indeed necessary, reading. Sorry mess, indeed. For his part, Ayers is at least equally enthralled by Said, of whom, even in death, Ayers says "[t]here is no one better positioned … to offer advice on the conduct of intellectual life[,]" than the man who was "over the last thirty-five years, the most passionate, eloquent, and clear-eyed advocate for the rights of the Palestinian people." After they left Columbia, both Obama and Ayers went to Chicago: Obama to become a "community organizer" (the director of the Developing Communities Project, an offshoot of theGamaliel Foundation dedicated to Saul Alinsky's principles for radicalizing society); Ayers, two years later, to teach at the University of Illinois. Diamond details how they both became embroiled in a major education controversy that resulted in 1988 reform legislation. Ayers's father, Tom Ayers, a prominent Chicago businessman, was also deeply involved in the reform effort. Interestingly, in 1988, while Obama and Ayers toiled on the same education agenda, Bernadine Dohrn worked as an intern at the prestigious Chicago law firm of Sidley Austin — even though she could not be admitted to the bar due to her contempt conviction for refusing to cooperate in a terrorist investigation. How could that happen? It turns out that Sidley was the longtime outside counsel for Tom Ayers's company, Commonwealth Edison. That is, Ayers' father had pull at the firm and successfully pressed for the hiring of his daughter-in-law.  The next summer, though he had gone off to Harvard Law School (another impressive accomplishment he prefers not to discuss), Obama returned to the Windy City to work as an intern at Sidley. Dohrn was gone by then to teach at Northwestern. A coincidence? Maybe (Diamond doesn't think so), but that's an awful lot of coincidences — and a long trail of common people, places and experiences — for people who purportedly didn't know each other yet managed to end up as partners in significant financial and political ventures. In short, Bill Ayers and Barack Obama moved in the same circles, were driven by the same cause, and admired the same radicals all the way from Morningside Heights to Hyde Park. They ended up publicly admiring each other, promoting each other's work, sitting on the same boards, and funding the same Leftist agitators. You could conclude, as I do, that it all goes back to a formative time in his life that Obama refuses to discuss. Or you could buy the fairy tale that Bill Ayers first encountered an unknown, inexperienced, third-year associate from a small Chicago law-firm over coffee in 1995 and suddenly decided Barack Obama was the perfect fit to oversee the $150 million pot of gold Ayers hoped would underwrite his revolution.

Dr. Raymond Jewell

http://financialfreedomradio.info

610-637-4884
Skype: rbjewell

Obama: Is He Truthful???

Barack Obama: All Talk on Equal Pay  "Barack Obama claims he's for equal pay for women, but women working in his Senate office earn an average of $9,000 less than men, while women in John McCain's Senate office earn an average of nearly $2,000 more than men. American women understand that real leadership is about what you do, not just what you say." -- McCain-Palin spokeswoman Crystal Benton   FACT CHECK: Records Show Women Working In Obama's Senate Office Were Paid Average Of $9,000 Less Than Men  According To Senate Records, Women Working In Obama's Senate Office Paid An Average Of $9,000 Less Than Men, As "Obama Pays Women Just 83 Cents For Every Dollar His Men Make." "Obama's commitment to federally mandated pay equity stretches from the Rockies to Wall Street and beyond. And yet it seems to have eluded his Senate office. Compensation figures for his legislative staff reveal that Obama pays women just 83 cents for every dollar his men make." (Deroy Murdock, Op-Ed, "Obama Only Talks Good Game On Gender Pay Equity," Seattle Post-Intelligencer, 9/11/08)   Columnist Deroy Murdock: "In short, these statistics suggest that John McCain is more than fair with his female employees, while Barack Obama -- at the expense of the women who work for him -- quietly perpetuates the very same pay-equity divide that he loudly denounces. Of all people, the Democratic standard bearer should understand that equal pay begins at home." (Deroy Murdock, Op-Ed, "Obama Only Talks Good Game On Gender Pay Equity," Seattle Post-Intelligencer, 9/11/08)   FACT CHECK: From October 2007 Through March 2008, Full Time Male Employees In The Senate Office Of Sen. Barack Obama Earned An Average Annual Salary Of $9,226.49 More Per Employee Than Full Time Female Employees:   The Average Annual Salary For Male Employees Employed In The Senate Office Of Sen. Barack Obama Was $54,379.16 compared to $45,152.57 for female employees. (Legistorm Website, www.legistorm.com, Accessed 9/1/08)    Of The Five Highest Paid Obama Staffers, Only One Is Female. (Legistorm Website, www.legistorm.com, Accessed 9/1/08)   Of The 20 Highest Paid Obama Staffers, Only 7 Are Female. (Legistorm Website, www.legistorm.com, Accessed 9/1/08) FACT CHECK: From October 2007 Through March 2008, Full Time Male Employees In The Senate Office Of Sen. John McCain Earned An Average Annual Salary Of Nearly $1,942.21 Less Per Employee Than Full Time Female Employees:   The Average Annual Salary For Male Employees Employed In The Senate Office Of Sen. John McCain Was $53,936.15 compared to $55,878.36 for female employees. (Legistorm Website, www.legistorm.com, Accessed 9/1/08) Of The Five Highest Paid McCain Staffers, Three Are Female. (Legistorm Website, www.legistorm.com, Accessed 9/1/08)   Of The 20 Highest Paid McCain Staffers, 13 Are Female. (Legistorm Website, www.legistorm.com, Accessed 9/1/08)

-- Dr. Raymond Jewell 610-637-4884 Skype: rbjewell

Success will not come by way of the IF ONLY camp

Hello Netrepreneur ,

If I Only Had The Time…            {Success will not come by way of the IF ONLY camp}

 

{This is an opportunity for the Weight Loss Camp to generate income}

How many times have you used this statement to excuse yourself from entering a business opportunity? How many times have you wanted to take advantage of a business opportunity and in your gut you knew it was right but something held you back? Many people want to create wealth and talk about how wealthy they want to be but don't take advantage of the opportunities when they present themselves.

In Napoleon Hill's book "Think and Grow Rich" he talks about the people who sit on the side lines and wish they could play the game but never get in it. If you are one of these people, here is an opportunity that can enable you to create passive income and utilize a team of people working for you to make you successful. I know that this sounds foreign to you but this is a new business model that is taken the business world by storm. This model is a buy customer and not leads model along with an army of people dedicated to assisting others in growing their businesses.

Let's talk about buying customers instead of leads. In other emails I have talked about buying customers that are already buying products. They are already sold by the company and the company spent the money to acquire the customer. Then they in turn sell the customer to the Business Affiliate and the Affiliate gets the commissions for life. Building a business like this is pain free.

In addition to buying customers the TOMORROW'S HOME BUSINESS TEAM has put together groups of people who specialize in specific areas of business. These people work together to get other's businesses growing faster. With the team effort anyone can choose to work as part of the team of just buying customers. This model has evolved into a solid business model that is producing results. The results that are being seen are amazing and breaking all records.

To hear more about this amazing opportunity go to our online meeting that is held every Thursday at 6:00 PM EST.in our teams conference room. Click this Conference Room link to arrive. Enter the room and click the 3rd tab at the top. Type your name in as the user name. And success as the password. You will learn how this marvellous business model works.

Shaun McClelland – Internet Marketing Facilitator
TOMORROW'S HOME BUSINESS
MARKETING TOOLS
Skype ID cashking777
(214) 717-4849 United States
0131 208 2302 United Kingdom
(07) 5641 0472 Australia

6 Changing Bad Habits to Lose Weight

Dear Weight Watcher,

 6 Changing Bad Habits            {Check out the link at the bottom to turn Weight Loss into a money machine}

Once you realize that most weight problems are related to bad habits you will understand that if you can eliminate these bad habits weight loss will follow. Most folk find it easy to lose the fat, the problem comes in maintaining the loss.

The first step in the process is to determine what your bad habits are. Look at the times when you tend to overeat and see if you can understand what triggers these reactions.

If you can eliminate those triggers and you can only do that by determining what they are in the first place then you will find it a lot easier to sort out your eating problems. Write down your vision and meditate on it until you believe it.

You should also look at the types of food that you go for during these times as often they will be comfort foods and more often than not these comfort foods are of very low nutritional value and due to that fact they will stimulate overeating.

By simply changing your comfort foods, with those that are of a higher nutritional value you will still be satisfying your needs by eliminating the negative side effects that are associated with poor food. I replaced chocolates for sunflower seeds, coke with filtered water.

As most things that we do in life are habitual we rarely think about the actions we take as we go about our daily routines on auto pilot. Unfortunately everything we do throughout the day includes both good and bad habits and it is those bad habits that are causing the damage.

As we age, more and more aspects of our life become habitual and it becomes more difficult to realize we have these habits and even more so to get rid of them particularly if we have had them for a long time. When I drink the water I mentally see it cleansing my body of toxins and flushing out the fat.

With a bit of personal analysis you will quickly become to notice the various different things that are leading up to your eating and weight problems.

If you only target one of these habits at a time it becomes a lot easier to make the changes and often changing one habit can have a positive affect on many other habits. The process certainly becomes easier the more you do it in and by concentrating more on that area rather than the food itself you will find that weight loss is not such an overwhelming part of your life.

Taking supplement will also help your mental challenge in that you will know you are eating for health and health will show up in due course.. To help you stay on track as well take a look at these Leanology supplements. Go to Leanology Appetite Control Chews Click on the Shop tab and scroll right down to Weight Loss and you will find this product list name.

That is an easily accomplished weight reduction with very little change to your lifestyle and habits.

Shaun McClelland.
WEIGHT LOSS SOLUTIONS
Nutritious Home Business
MARKETING TOOLS
Skype ID cashking777
(214) 717-4849 United States

Weight Loss Calories Revisited

Dear Person of resolve,     {Lose body fat and Learn how to turn your Weight Loss Program into a Home Based Busines}

5 Calories Revisited

The problem with restricting your calories too much is the fact that it slows down your metabolism and in doing so it makes it all the more difficult to sustain weight loss. Your body goes into survival mode and when you add more calories. Guess what? Your body sucks up the extra calories and stores them as body fat in preperation for the famine it thinks is ahead.

This is one of the reasons why it is suggested that you don't reduce your calories by an excessive amount on a daily basis if you want to keep reducing weight over the long-term.

On the other hand when you have excess calories over and above the energy needs of your body then these calories will be stored as fat.

You can see by the last two sentences that it is crucially important for you to get your calorie intake levels correct if you are to lose weight.

Your daily calorie requirement depends on a number of different factors including your weight, your age, gender and your lifestyle as a more active person will need more calories due to the fact that they will be burning more in the course of the day.

On average every pound of your body weight represents approximately 3500 calories. Based on this average, to lose 1 pound you will need to reduce your calorie intake by 3500 calories. On diet alone, you can see how it won't be possible to lose a pound a day unless of course you already have a considerable calorie intake and the reduction will still leave you with sufficient food and nutrition to remain healthy.

Supplements can certainly help to make up for any nutrition deficiencies a lot of the time. To help you stay on track as well take a look at Leanology supplements. Go to Leanology Appetite Control Chews Click on the Shop tab and scroll right down to Weight Loss and you will find this product list name. By reducing your calories by only 100 calories per day over the course of the year you would have consumed 36,500 less calories and that converts to a weight reduction of almost 10 1/2 pounds.

That is an easily accomplished weight reduction with very little change to your lifestyle and habits.

Shaun McClelland.
WEIGHT LOSS SOLUTIONS
Nutritious Home Business
MARKETING TOOLS
Skype ID cashking777
(214) 717-4849 United States

Make Money Without Calling Leads

If you ever wondered what an exceptional business model looks like, take a look at the following information about the TriVita Business Model. It is possible to make a substantial income, long term, without ever having to make a phone call. All you have to do is buy customers that are already sold. If you want to get a further explanation as to how the business works simply come to a live on-line meeting at http://tomorrowshomebusiness.butchhamilton.com and sign in using the password: success. Our meetings are held every Thursday at 6:00 PM PST. Also come to our Sunday Workshop at 6:00 PM PST and learn about our marketing and SEO strategies.  You will be amazed at what you see and hear.  Dr. Raymond Jewell, Economic Advisor http://FinancialFreedomRadio.info                                                       ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- *TriVita's Career Path & Compensation Plan TriVita's Career Plan is unique in the industry with its dual commission payout plan to allow you to earn maximum earnings. A simple understanding of the compensation plan will help you build the best team for maximum pay out. The Compensation plan can be broken down into 4 sections: Monthly Qualifications Member and Business 7-Tier Payout Director Commissions Presidential Commissions

1. Member and Team Building Bonuses - Pays Twice Monthly

All Bonuses are for the first sale only and are paid on Reward Value. All bonuses dynamically compress. Personally Acquired Members Bonus - 70% of RV paid to Enroller on personally enrolled members MAP Bonus - Pays bi-monthly - 40% of RV paid to Enroller and 10% of RV paid to the Enroller of the Enroller on MAP members Coded Business Pack Bonus: - Pays monthly    Pays on the purchase of either the $500 Basic Pack or the $1750 Complete Pack  Only pays to Enroller BAs that have purchased the Basic Pack or the Complete Pack   Enroller 2 Star BA 3 Star BA All enrollments with either the Basic or Complete Pack after the 3rd Pack pay the same as the 3rd Pack. 1st Pack $100 $75 $50 2nd Pack $150 $50 $25 3rd Pack $175 $25 $25

2. Leadership Support Bonus: - Pays Twice Monthly

$25 is paid to the closest Placement Director on the purchase of the Basic or Complete Pack. Only pays to Placement Directors that have purchased the Basic Pack or the Complete Pack.

		Trivita Career Path & Compensation Plan
CAREER PATH	BUSINESS AFFILIATE	1 STAR BUSINESS AFFILIATE	2 STAR BUSINESS AFFILIATE	3 STAR BUSINESS AFFILIATE	4 STAR BUSINESS AFFILIATE	DIRECTOR	1 STAR DIRECTOR	2 STAR DIRECTOR	3 STAR DIRECTOR	PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTOR
Personal Order	20	50	100	100	100	100	100	100	100	100
AutoShip Order
Monthly TGV within 7 Tiers			2,500	5,000	10,000	25,000	50,000	75,000	100,000	250,000
50% Team Rule
Personally Enrolled BAs		1	2	3	3	3	3	3	3	3
Director Legs							1	2	3	3

3. Member Commissions - Pays Once Monthly
Tier 1	21%	21%	21%	21%	21%	21%	21%	21%	21%	21%
Tier 2	4%	4%	4%	4%	4%	4%	4%	4%	4%	4%
Tier 3	4%	4%	4%	4%	4%	4%	4%	4%	4%	4%
Tier 4		4%	4%	4%	4%	4%	4%	4%	4%	4%
Tier 5			4%	4%	4%	4%	4%	4%	4%	4%
Tier 6				4%	4%	4%	4%	4%	4%	4%
Tier 7					4%	4%	4%	4%	4%	4%

4. Business Affiliate Commissions - Pays Once Monthly
Tier 1	3%	3%	3%	3%	3%	3%	3%	3%	3%	3%
Tier 2	7%	7%	7%	7%	7%	7%	7%	7%	7%	7%
Tier 3	7%	7%	7%	7%	7%	7%	7%	7%	7%	7%
Tier 4		7%	7%	7%	7%	7%	7%	7%	7%	7%
Tier 5			7%	7%	7%	7%	7%	7%	7%	7%
Tier 6				7%	7%	7%	7%	7%	7%	7%
Tier 7					7%	7%	7%	7%	7%	7%

5. Director Commissions - Pays Once Monthly
Director Commission	4%	4%	4%	4%	4%
1 Star Director Commission		2%	2%	2%	2%
2 Star Director Commission			2%	2%	2%
3 Star Director Commission				2%	2%

6. Presidential Commission - Pays Once Monthly
Pays on TGV through 4 generations of Presidential Directors	1%

Glossary of Terms
Tier: The structure utilized to organize the relationships of Prospects, Members, Affiliate Members, and Business Affiliates VitaPoint: A value assigned to a TriVita product for the purpose of determining Business Affiliate ranks and qualifications for compensation. VitaPoints are universal and are the same in all countries Reward Value: A value assigned to a TriVita product upon which compensation is calculated. Reward Value varies by country Enroller: The Business Affiliate who introduces a new Member or Business Affiliate to TriVita. Determines payout of Member and Team Building Bonuses Placement: The Business Affiliate under whom an Enroller places a new Member or Business Affiliate. Determines upline and downline for all compensation except for those first sale bonuses paid to the Enroller Compression: A process that temporarily removes, for the purpose of calculating compensation, any Business Affiliate with no personal order from the Tier structure of the Reciprocity Rewards Compensation Plan, and builds a Tier structure comprised of qualified Business Affiliates only (Note: For compression purposes customers do not create Tiers.) Dynamic Compression: An advanced form of compression that compresses unilevel payout through Business Affiliates that are not qualified to a specific Tier and pays that Tier in the unilevel payout to the first qualified upline Business Affiliate		Leg: Each Business Affiliate on your Tier 1 creates a Leg. All customers and Business Affiliates under each Tier 1 Business Affiliate comprise a Leg Personal Order: The amount of VitaPoints required in a Business Affiliate's personal monthly order Autoship Order: To qualify for the rank of 1 Star Business Affiliate or higher Business Affiliates are required to have an active Autoship Order Monthly TGV (Total Group Volume) within 7 Tiers: The amount of VitaPoints required per month within 7 compressed tiers 50% Team Rule: A rule that allows no more than 50% of the required TGV for a particular rank to be contributed from each leg Personally Enrolled BAs: Indicates the number of personally enrolled Business Affiliates within 7 tiers. Director Legs: Indicates the number of Director Legs required to qualify at the respective Director rank. A Director Leg is defined as any Leg that contains 1 or more Directors anywhere within the Leg (to the bottom of the Leg) Director Commissions: Compensation paid to Directors that pay on all BA volume, down to the next Director of the respective rank. Presidential Commissions: Compensation paid to Presidential Directors on Total Group Volume through 4 generations of Presidential Directors

*Trivita.net